Post by rakuflames on Apr 14, 2008 13:59:58 GMT -5
Well, I'm in the middle here. I don't see any problem with changing a child's diet, if the child is allergic to something. In fact, any good parent would. Milk allergies can be tested, as they were with my son, and I KNOW allergy shots have helped my son's behavior, even though of the eighteen things he's allergic to, milk is not one of them. He was much more antsy and fussy in the spring, when his allergies were really acting up, but most kids are more antsy and fussy when they are sick. Allergies can make a kid feel horrible!
What concerns me, though, is removing seemingly healthy foods from your child's diet, when there is no evidence your child is allergic to them. Healthy, nutritious, fresh food is a beautiful thing, one of the greatest pleasures in life. Dinner at a gourmet restaurant is the best gift anyone can give me. Keep the diamond earrings or the emerald ring. I'll take good, fresh French food over those any day! If I had a choice of driving a ten-year-old car that ran well enough to get me where I needed to go and eating at great restaurants, or driving a new car and eating at McDonald's? No question. Bring the jalopy on! When foods, like milk, start getting eliminated from a diet with no proof the child is allergic to it, then a whole host of foods go with it--cheese, milk-based sauces, gravies--and the child is deprived of experiencing how truly wonderful this basic necessity of life, that we call food, can be!
I agree with you. We actually had a PEDIATRICIAN tell us our daughter was allergic to milk. It really made problems. If the class had a pizza party, she couldn't have any. She had to bring her own ice cream to birthday parties. It went on and on.
And, guess what. She wasn't even allergic to it. My sister is lactose-intolerant. If she takes lactaid she can tolerate a fair amount of milk product. I have a friend, however, for whom the lactaid doesn't help much. Often she goes ahead and eats -- and really suffers the next day.